Memoirs of the Jacobites of 1715 and 1745. Volume II. — Reading Companion
Edition facts
For Memoirs of the Jacobites of 1715 and 1745. Volume II. — Reading Companion, the stored edition analysis reports 103,866 words, 7 hr 32 min estimated reading time, and 12 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 28.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Jacobite Rebellion, 1745-1746,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Morton was killed. The injury was not forgotten, and John, who succeeded the murdered man, deemed it incumbent upon him to avenge his father. In consequence, the Laird of Johnstone soon fell a sacrifice to this notion of honour, or outbreak of offended pride. The crime was not, however, passed over by law; the offender was tried, and executed, in 1613, at the Cross in Edinburgh; and his honours were forfeited. But again the favour of the Stuarts shone forth; the title of Morton was not restored, but Robert, the brother of the last Earl of Morton, was created Earl of Nithisdale, and restored to the Lordship of Maxwell; with precedency, as Earl, according to his father's creation as Earl of Morton.
This kindness was requited by a devoted loyalty; and, in the reign of Charles the First, the Earl of Nithisdale suffered much, both by sequestration and imprisonment, for the royal cause.
In 1647, in consequence of failure of the direct line, the title and estates of the Nithisdale family devolved on a kinsman, John Lord Herries, whose grandson, William, the subject of this memoir, proved to be the last of the Maxwell family that has ever enjoyed the Earldom.
He was served heir male, and of line male and entail of his father, on the twenty-sixth of May, 1696; and heir male of his grandfather, the Earl of Nithisdale, on the sixteenth of the same month.[1] At his accession to his title, the Earl of Nithisdale possessed no common advantages of fortune and station. "He was allied," says the Scottish Peerage, "to most of the noble families in the two kingdoms." His mother, the Lady Lucy, was daughter to the Marquis of Douglas; his only sister, Lady Mary Maxwell, was married to Charles Stewart, Earl of Traquair; and he had himself wedded a descendant of that noble and brave Marquis of Worcester who had defended Ragland Castle against Fairfax.
In addition to these family honours, Lord Nithisdale possessed rich patrimonial estates in one of the most fertile and luxuriant counties in Scotland. The Valley of the Nith, from which he derived his title, owned his lordship over some of its fairest scenes. Young, rich, and happily married, he was in the full sunshine of prosperity when, in the year 1715, he was called upon to prove the sincerity of that fidelity to the house of Stuart for which his family had so greatly suffered, and for which it had been so liberally repaid.
It is remarkable that the adventurers in the unfortunate cause of the Chevalier St. George were, with rare exceptions, men of established credit, men who had vast stakes in their country, and who had lost no portion of their due consideration in the eyes of others by extravagance or profligacy. This fact marks the insurrection of 1715, as presenting a very different aspect to that of other insurrections raised by faction, and supported by men of desperate fortunes. So early as the year 1707, it appears by Colonel Hooke's secret negotiations in favour of the Stuarts, that the bulk of the Scottish nobility had their hearts engaged in the cause, and that their honour was pledged to come forward on the first occasion. In the enumeration given by one of the agents employed in traversing the country, Lord Nithisdale and his relatives are mentioned as certain and potent allies. "In Tweedale," writes Mr. Fleming to the Minister of Louis the Fourteenth, "the Earl of Traquair, of the house of Stuart, and the Laird of Stanhope are powerful. In the shires of Annandale, Niddesdale, and Galloway, are the Earl of Niddesdale, with the Viscount of Kenmure, the Laird of Spinkell, with the numerous clan of the Maxwells; and there is some hope also of the Earl of Galloway; Thus the King's party is connected through the whole kingdom, and we are certain of being masters of all the shires, except Argyleshire, Clydesdale, Renfrew, Dumbarton, and Kyle."[2] "An affair of this nature," adds Mr. Fleming, "cannot be communicated to all the well affected; and it is a great proof of the zeal of those to whom it is trusted, that so many people have been able to keep this secret so inviolably." Such was the commencement of that compact which, held together by the word of Scotchmen, was in few instances broken; but was maintained with as scrupulous a regard to honour and fidelity by the poorest Highlander that ever trod down the heather, as by the great nobleman within his castle hall.
Mrs. Thomson opens the memoir of William Maxwell, Earl of Nithisdale, by quoting the editor of the Culloden Papers on Highland devotion to the Stuarts, then immediately traces the Maxwell lineage back to Robert de Maxwell, killed at Bannockburn in 1314. This pattern—anchoring a Jacobite life in medieval origins—recurs throughout the volume. The narrative moves from the Maxwells’ early royal favours to the castle of Carlaverock, described as “a memento, in its noble ruins,” and then to the dramatic 1715 escape engineered by the Countess. Thomson’s method is to build each biography from genealogical foundations, then narrow to the crisis of rebellion.
Genealogical Foundations and Clan Origins
Each memoir begins with a detailed family history. For the Frasers, Thomson recounts a fable that a Norman nobleman named Julius de Berry presented Charles the Simple with a dish of strawberries, earning the surname Fraize—hence the strawberry field in the Fraser coat of arms. She then traces the family from Normandy to Scotland under Malcolm Canmore, through marriages and land acquisitions in Tweedale, Aberdeenshire, and Inverness-shire. The castle of Beaufort, “anciently a royal fortress,” was granted to the Frasers in 1367. Thomson notes that the name was once written Frezeau or Frisil, and she presents alternative Scandinavian origin theories. This genealogical scaffolding gives each Jacobite a deep historical root, linking personal loyalty to centuries of clan tradition.
Recurring Images of Fortresses and Ruins
Castles and fortresses appear as both physical settings and symbols. Carlaverock is a “noble ruin”; Beaufort is described as “built on a part of the ground originally occupied by a fortress,” on a “beautiful eminence near the Beauly.” Thomson mentions that Beaufort was besieged by Edward I’s army using catapults at seven hundred yards. A subsidiary fortress, Lovat, “heretofore inhabited by one of the constables of the Crown,” also fell to the Frasers. These descriptions anchor the narrative in specific topography and evoke the decay of once-powerful strongholds, mirroring the decline of the Jacobite cause itself.
Acts of Fidelity and Sacrifice
Thomson highlights dramatic instances of personal loyalty. In the Fraser section, she recounts how Sir Simon Fraser, “commonly called the Patriot,” thrice remounted Robert the Bruce at the Battle of Methven. After Fraser was captured and sentenced to death, his follower Herbert de Norham and armour-bearer Thomas de Boys swore they would not survive him and “died voluntarily on the day of his execution.” Thomson calls this “one of those romantic instances of Highland devotion, which appear almost incredible to the calmer notions of a modern era.” Such episodes of self-sacrifice recur across the memoirs, emphasizing a code of honour that transcends political calculation.
Movement Between Public and Private Spheres
The memoirs shift between battlefield or political narrative and intimate family scenes. The Nithisdale memoir moves from the earl’s capture to the countess’s “determined and heroic affection” that engineered his prison escape. Thomson presents this as a point of pride for descendants, linking “courage and fidelity” in public rebellion to private devotion. The Fraser narrative similarly alternates between sieges and genealogical details of marriages and inheritances. This oscillation between the public stage of rebellion and the domestic realm of family honour gives the volume a dual focus: the Jacobite risings as both a historical event and a family drama.
Readers will find that Thomson’s method—opening each memoir with a clan’s medieval origins, then narrowing to the crisis of 1715 or 1745—creates a cumulative effect. The volume is best approached not as a continuous narrative but as a series of self-contained family histories, each with its own cast of fortresses, loyal retainers, and moments of sacrifice. Pay attention to the recurring motifs of ruins and rescue; they give the work a consistent emotional register.
Those Jacobite stories linger like candlelight on old stone—especially the Countess sneaking her husband out in a gown. That quiet defiance feels kin to the frontier hardship chronicled in The Winning of the West, Volume 4 Louisiana and the Northwest, 1791-1807 — Edition Insights. Both deal in loyalties that demand everything, and leave you sitting still, afterward, staring at nothing.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.