Memoirs of Louis XIV and His Court and of the Regency — Volume 02 — A Closer Reading

(0 User reviews)   64
In Category - Modern Nations
Saint-Simon, Louis de Rouvroy, duc de, 1675-1755 Project Gutenberg 2004 Not confirmed
France -- Court and courtiers; France -- History -- Louis XIV, 1643-1715; France -- History -- Regency, 1715-1723 Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 37,920
Reading time 165 min
Text sections 3

This digital edition of Memoirs of Louis XIV and His Court and of the Regency — Volume 02 — A Closer Reading is described by source-level measurements including 37,920 words, 2 hr 45 min estimated reading time, and 3 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “France -- Court and courtiers,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Saint-Simon's memoir recounts court intrigues, scandals, and the king's projects, with sharp observations on hypocrisy and ignorance among nobles.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Maintenon were much relieved by the loss of M. de Paris. Various places he had held were at once distributed. His archbishopric and his nomination to the cardinalship required more discussion. The King learnt the news of the death of M. de Paris on the 6th. On the 8th, in going as usual to his cabinet, he went straight up to the Bishop of Orleans, led him to the Cardinals de Bouillon and de Fursternberg, and said to them:- "Gentlemen, I think you will thank me for giving you an associate like M. d'Orleans, to whom I give my nomination to the cardinalship." At this word the Bishop, who little expected such a scene, fell at the King's feet and embraced his knees. He was a man whose face spoke at once of the virtue and benignity he possessed. In youth he was so pious, that young and old were afraid to say afoul word in his presence. Although very rich, he appropriated scarcely any of his wealth to himself, but gave it away for good works. The modesty and the simplicity with which M. d'Orleans sustained his nomination, increased the universal esteem in which he was held.

The archbishopric of Paris was given to a brother of the Duc de Noailles- the Bishop of Chalons-sur-Marne--M. de Noailles thus reaping the fruit of his wise sacrifice to M. de Vendome, before related. M. de Chalons was of singular goodness and modesty. He did not wish for this preferment, and seeing from far the prospect of its being given to him, hastened to declare himself against the Jesuits, in the expectation that Pere la Chaise, who was of them, and who was always consulted upon these occasions, might oppose him. But it happened, perhaps for the first time, that Madame de Maintenon, who felt restrained by the Jesuits, did not consult Pere la Chaise, and the preferment was made without his knowledge, and without that of M. de Chalons. The affront was a violent one, and the Jesuits never forgave the new Archbishop: he was, however, so little anxious for the office, that it was only after repeated orders he could be made to accept it.

The Bishop of Langres also died about this time. He was a true gentleman, much liked, and called "the good Langres." There was nothing bad about him, except his manners; he was not made for a bishop--gambled very much, and staked high. M. de Vendome and others won largely at billiards of him, two or three times. He said no word, but, on returning to Langres, did nothing but practise billiards in secret for six months. When next in Paris, he was again asked to play, and his adversaries, who thought him as unskilful as before, expected an easy victory but, to their astonishment, he gained almost every game, won back much more than he had lost, and then laughed in the faces of his companions.

I paid about this time, my first journey to Marly, and a singular scene happened there. The King at dinner, setting aside his usual gravity, laughed and joked very much with Madame la Duchesse, eating olives with her in sport, and thereby causing her to drink more than usual--which he also pretended to do. Upon rising from the table the King, seeing the Princesse de Conti look extremely serious, said, dryly, that her gravity did not accommodate itself to their drunkenness. The Princess, piqued, allowed the King to pass without saying anything; and then, turning to Madame de Chatillon, said, in the midst of the noise, whilst everybody was washing his mouth, "that she would rather be grave than be a wine- sack" (alluding to some bouts a little prolonged that her sister had recently had).

The saying was heard by the Duchesse de Chartres, who replied, loud enough to be heard, in her slow and trembling voice, that she preferred to be a "winesack" rather than a "rag-sack" (sac d guenilles) by which she alluded to the Clermont and La Choin adventure I have related before.

This remark was so cruel that it met with no reply; it spread through Marly, and thence to Paris; and Madame la Duchesse, who had the art of writing witty songs, made one upon this theme. The Princesse de Conti was in despair, for she had not the same weapon at her disposal. Monsieur tried to reconcile them gave them a dinner at Meudon--but they returned from it as they went.

Saint-Simon opens this volume with the death of Harlay, Archbishop of Paris, who died of epilepsy at Conflans in August 1695. The memoirist notes that Harlay had lost favor with Louis XIV and Madame de Maintenon for opposing the declaration of their marriage, of which he had been a witness. The archbishop's decline is marked by a peculiar detail: gardeners followed him and the Duchesse de Lesdiguieres at a distance, raking over their footprints to keep the garden pristine. This image of erased traces becomes a metaphor for the court's erasure of inconvenient truths.

The narrative then shifts to the distribution of Harlay's offices, including the king's nomination of the Bishop of Orleans to the cardinalship—a scene of unexpected favor that reveals the king's control over ecclesiastical appointments.

Scandal at La Trappe

Saint-Simon recounts the fall of Francois Gervaise, a monk at La Trappe, whose hypocrisy is exposed in a letter to a nun. The letter is described as "a tissue of filthiness and stark indecency," written in "the boldest language, and with the utmost licence." Gervaise, after resigning his office, attempts to regain favor with Pere la Chaise, but the discovery of the letter stops him. Saint-Simon himself obtains a lettre de cachet to keep Gervaise away from La Trappe and Paris. The episode illustrates the tension between outward piety and hidden corruption, a recurring theme in the memoirs.

Ignorance at Court

Two anecdotes highlight the ignorance of courtiers. Breteuil, who obtained the post of introducer of ambassadors, is tricked into claiming that Moses wrote the Lord's Prayer, leading to lasting ridicule. The Marquis de Gesvres, admiring paintings of the Crucifixion, insists they are all by the same painter because each bears the inscription "INRI," mistaking the acronym for an artist's name. These stories, told with dry humor, reveal the shallowness of courtly pretension and the ease with which the educated mocked the uneducated.

The King's Projects

At the end of the year, Louis XIV resolves to undertake three grand projects: the chapel of Versailles, the Church of the Invalides, and the altar of Notre-Dame de Paris. Saint-Simon notes that these "ought to have been carried out long before," implying the king's delay. The projects reflect the king's desire to leave a monumental legacy, yet the memoirist's tone suggests a critique of priorities—grand buildings over more pressing matters. This section contrasts the king's public piety with the private scandals detailed earlier.

Saint-Simon's memoir offers a view of Louis XIV's court that is neither hagiography nor simple gossip. Readers should attend to the author's placement of anecdotes: the juxtaposition of high ecclesiastical scandal with trivial courtly ignorance reveals a world where power and folly coexist. The king's architectural ambitions, set against the moral failures of his clergy, invite reflection on the gap between public image and private reality.

There’s something almost tender in how Saint-Simon notices the hollow pride of the court, how we cling to titles when the substance fades. It put me in mind of another quiet account, one that traces a different kind of loyalty—The Story of the Guides — Key Ideas to Explore—where duty too becomes its own strange, worn armor. Funny how those old shadows still follow us.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How will you remember this book?

Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

How likely are you to recommend this book?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks