The captivity, sufferings, and escape of James Scurry Who was detained a prisoner during ten years, in the dominions of Hyder Ali and Tippoo Saib — Edition Insights

(0 User reviews)   1567
In Category - Modern Nations
Scurry, James Project Gutenberg 2016 Not confirmed
India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947; Tipu Sultan, Fath 'Ali, Nawab of Mysore, 1753-1799; Haidar Ali, Nawab of Mysore, approximately 1722-1782 Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 40,442
Reading time 176 min
Text sections 11

For The captivity, sufferings, and escape of James Scurry Who was detained a prisoner during ten years, in the dominions of Hyder Ali and Tippoo Saib — Edition Insights, the stored edition analysis reports 40,442 words, 2 hr 56 min estimated reading time, and 11 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 30.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

James Scurry's first-person account of ten years' captivity under Hyder Ali and Tippoo Saib, written in a plain, unadorned style. The narrative shifts between stark descriptions of suffering, moments of dark humor, and observations of local customs, all grounded in the author's stated commitment to truth over embellishment.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

n this situation we remained two months, when an order came from Hyder Ali to march us from thence to Bangalore; in consequence of which, our irons being knocked off, we were coupled two and two in hand-irons. This being done, we were marched out of the fort, not knowing our destination. In this case there was no distinction, except that the officers were kept separate; for all were linked, both officers and men. We had the painful sight of seeing them pass us in irons; a state of degradation which affected many of us, and myself for one. Our first lieutenant and the lieutenant of marines, named Carthew, were brothers; these worthy men were coupled together in a double sense, viz. fraternal affection, and strong bolts of iron. They were, however, released from bondage in the year 1784, and are, I believe, both still living, one an admiral, and the other a clergyman.

We soon understood that our destination was Bangalore; our march commenced, and a severe one it was: several had no shoes, which was no small misfortune; many being coupled together whose tempers were by no means congenial, was another source of evil, and particularly so after a heavy day’s march. It frequently happened that we were kept, though I believe, not designedly, without food for many hours after reaching the ground on which we were to sleep; and wo to the poor weary wretch who should attempt to sit down to rest himself, for in this case he would be sure to have the application of the but-end of a musket between his shoulders: in short, no butcher ever drove oxen with more cruelty than we were driven. In order to prevent a surprise, we were taken by the most unfrequented ways; and one day, in a most dreadful abyss on the margin of the road, we heard the noise, as we supposed, of a rattlesnake, which alarmed us all; but if it was such, it must have been of an enormous size, otherwise it could not have made the noise it did.

A curious circumstance took place at one of our halting spots, which were mostly under trees, and which, though alarming at the time, was very laughable afterwards. Two of our men, about one o’clock in the morning, were preparing their rice coffee, in order to be ready for the morning’s march; when taking their cudgeree-pot off the fire, it broke, and scalded one of them, who gave a terrible roar, which was mistaken for a tiger’s by those near him, who were not half awake. This induced them to bawl out,—a tiger! a tiger! which was quickly communicated to the whole, as they were successively roused from their sleep. Our officers, being near us, took the alarm also; and such a scene of confusion ensued, as would require an abler pen than mine to describe. All were intent on personal safety, but all were not of one mind; hence, one hauled this way, and another that, till twenty or thirty pairs came in contact; numbers fell on each other, while some endeavoured to haul their weaker partners up into trees. The guards were running about like madmen, not knowing the cause of this hurly-burly; and I am persuaded to this day, had we not been ironed, the guards would never have entered our thoughts, and many would have been miles distant in a very short time. Several had the marks of this dragging business, on their wrists, for months afterwards. Smith, our corporal of marines, being the only man out of irons, and who could talk Moorish well, was sent for by the chief of the guard, who, I believe, was as much frightened as ourselves; but when he understood the cause of all this confusion, he was highly pleased, for he was apprehensive of something worse. Many of the guards were at a considerable distance at this time; but the panic gradually subsiding, the tom-toms were sounded, the horns were blown, the guards collected, and we composed ourselves to sleep, wondering at what had happened.

James Scurry's narrative opens with a preface that frames the work as a corrective to exaggerated accounts of Mysorean cruelty: the publisher claims that only the sight of mutilated survivors could make such stories believable. Scurry himself, in prefatory notes, insists he has omitted events whose dates he could not verify, lest any inaccuracy impeach his veracity. This concern for credibility shapes the entire text, which moves between blunt reportage—crowded prisons, iron chains, and the constant threat of execution—and moments of wry observation, such as when a failed nose-construction operation leaves a patient demanding his six rupees back.

A Voice Between Horror and Humor

Elsewhere, Scurry recounts a fellow prisoner's attempt to graft a new nose onto a local man using skin from his shoulder. The operation initially seems successful, but after three weeks 'the stitches decayed, and the artificial nose fell off.' The patient's demand for a refund is met with futility: 'he might as well have asked for Tippoo's turban jewel.' This anecdote, told with a deadpan delivery, reveals both the prisoners' desperate improvisation and the absurdity of their situation.

Structure and the Passage of Time

Longer intervals are summarized with phrases like 'three tedious years rolled over our heads,' during which Scurry learns the history of a fortress from 'intelligent Hindoos' and observes a Brahmin who lay in one spot for fourteen years, cursing Hyder and Tippoo. These compressed passages suggest that Scurry's memory is selective, focusing on events that illustrate the captors' cruelty or the prisoners' resourcefulness, while acknowledging that much of his experience remains unrecorded.

Setting and the Limits of Observation

Yet these sparse settings carry symbolic weight. Chitteldroog, 'situated on seven hills,' is noted as potentially impregnable, yet it is the site where 'many poor unfortunate wretches were put to death.' The contrast between the fortress's natural strength and its use as a place of execution underscores the prisoners' powerlessness. Similarly, the Brahmin's fourteen-year vigil in a spot so low that Scurry wonders how he survived monsoon floods becomes a emblem of passive resistance—a single voice of imprecation against the rulers who hold Scurry captive.

Scurry's narrative resists easy categorization: it is neither a travelogue nor a formal history, but a personal testimony shaped by the author's stated commitment to truth. Readers should attend to the shifts in pace—from the rapid succession of events in the early chapters to the compressed years later—and to the dry humor that surfaces even in dire circumstances. The account's value lies not in its completeness but in its frank acknowledgment of what Scurry cannot verify, leaving the reader to weigh the evidence of a survivor who chose to omit rather than invent.

I keep thinking how Scurry names plain pain—hunger, chains, heat—without dressing it up, and that honesty stays with me. It’s the same quiet feeling I had closing Wichita, where the landscape itself seemed to hold a long, wordless patience. Both books let the weight sit, not explain it away. Wichita — Edition Insights reminded me that some truths don’t need polish, just witness.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What did you think of this book?

Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

How far have you progressed with this book?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks