Pickle the Spy; Or, the Incognito of Prince Charles — Reading Notes

(0 User reviews)   22
In Category - Modern Nations
Lang, Andrew, 1844-1912 Project Gutenberg 2004 Not confirmed
Jacobite Rebellion, 1745-1746; Macdonell, Alastair Ruadh, 1725?-1761; Charles Edward, Prince, grandson of James II, King of England, 1720-1788 Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 86,237
Reading time 375 min
Text sections 9

Pickle the Spy; Or, the Incognito of Prince Charles — Reading Notes can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 86,237 words, 6 hr 15 min estimated reading time, and 9 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 20.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Jacobite Rebellion, 1745-1746,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Andrew Lang's 1897 historical study unravels the double life of Alastair Ruadh Macdonell, a Highland chief who betrayed the Jacobite cause as the spy 'Pickle,' using secret correspondence and Stuart Papers to expose Prince Charles Edward Stuart's incognito.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

iterary tastes—His clemency—His honourable conduct—Contrast with Cumberland—His graciousness—His faults—Charge of avarice—Love of wine—Religious levity—James on Charles’s faults—An unpleasant discovery—Influence of Murray of Broughton—Rapid decline of character after 1746—Temper, wine, and women—Deep distrust of James’s Court—Rupture with James—Divisions among Jacobites—King’s men and Prince’s men—Marischal, Kelly, Lismore, Clancarty—Anecdote of Clancarty and Braddock—Clancarty and d’Argenson—Balhaldie—Lally Tollendal—The Duke of York—His secret flight from Paris—‘Insigne Fourberie’—Anxiety of Charles—The fatal cardinal’s hat—Madame de Pompadour—Charles rejects her advances—His love affairs—Madame de Talmond—Voltaire’s verses on her—Her scepticism in religion—Her husband—Correspondence with Montesquieu—The Duchesse d’Aiguillon—Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle—Charles refuses to retire to Fribourg—The gold plate—Scenes with Madame de Talmond—Bulkeley’s interference—Arrest of Charles—The compasses—Charles goes to Avignon—His desperate condition—His policy—Based on a scheme of d’Argenson—He leaves Avignon—He is lost to sight and hearing.

‘CHARLES EDWARD STUART,’ says Lord Stanhope, ‘is one of those characters that cannot be portrayed at a single sketch, but have so greatly altered as to require a new delineation at different periods.’ {12a} Now he ‘glitters all over like the star which they tell you appeared at his nativity,’ and which still shines beside him, _Micat inter omnes_, on a medal struck in his boyhood. {12b} Anon he is sunk in besotted vice, a cruel lover, a solitary tippler, a broken man. We study the period of transition.

Descriptions of his character vary between the noble encomium written in prison by Archibald Cameron, the last man who died for the Stuarts, and the virulent censures of Lord Elcho and Dr. King. Veterans known to Sir Walter Scott wept at the mention of the Prince’s name; yet, as early as the tenth year after Prestonpans, his most devoted adherent, Henry Goring, left him in an angry despair. Nevertheless, the character so variously estimated, so tenderly loved, so loathed, so despised, was one character; modified, swiftly or slowly, as its natural elements developed or decayed under the various influences of struggle, of success, of long endurance, of hope deferred, and of bitter disappointment. The gay, kind, brave, loyal, and clement Prince Charlie became the fierce, shabby, battered exile, homeless, and all but friendless. The change, of course, was not instantaneous, but gradual; it was not the result of one, but of many causes. Even out of his final degradation, Charles occasionally speaks with his real voice: his inborn goodness of heart, remarked before his earliest adventures, utters its protest against the self he has become; just as, on the other hand, long ere he set his foot on Scottish soil, his father had noted his fatal inclination to wine and revel.

The processes in this change of character, the events, the temptations, the trials under which Charles became an altered man, have been very slightly studied, and, indeed, have been very obscurely known. Even Mr. Ewald, the author of the most elaborate biography of the Prince, {13} neglected some important French printed sources, while manuscript documents, here for the first time published, were not at his command. The present essay is itself unavoidably incomplete, for of family papers bearing on the subject many have perished under the teeth of time, and in one case, of rats, while others are not accessible to the writer. Nevertheless, it is hoped that this work elucidates much which has long been veiled in the motives, conduct, and secret movements of Charles during the years between 1749 and the death, in 1766, of his father, the Old Chevalier. Charles then emerged from a retirement of seventeen years; the European game of Hide and Seek was over, and it is not proposed to study the Prince in the days of his manifest decline, and among the disgraces of his miserable marriage. His ‘incognito’ is our topic; the period of ‘deep and isolated enterprise’ which puzzled every Foreign Office in Europe, and practically only ended, as far as hope was concerned, with the break-up of the Jacobite party in 1754–1756, or rather with Hawke’s defeat of Conflans in 1759.

Ours is a strange and melancholy tale of desperate loyalties, and of a treason almost unparalleled for secrecy and persistence. We have to do with the back-stairs of diplomacy, with spies and traitors, with cloak and sword, with blabbing servants, and inquisitive ambassadors, with disguise and discovery, with friends more staunch than steel, or weaker than water, with petty jealousies, with the relentless persecution of a brave man, and with the consequent ruin of a gallant life.

Andrew Lang opens Pickle the Spy not with a romantic flourish but with a confession: this 'woful History' began in the British Museum's Pelham Papers, where he found letters of the spy Pickle and James Mohr Macgregor. Lang sent transcripts to Robert Louis Stevenson for an unfinished novel, then chose instead to tell the story 'with fidelity.' The result is a work that straddles archival rigor and the allure of historical romance, anchored in the Stuart Papers at Windsor Castle and the Pickle Papers in state documents. Lang's preface names his debts—to Miss E. A. Ibbs for copying, to Miss Violet Simpson for verifying references—and his disclaimer that he believes no imputations against Cluny, a chief whose destitution in France refutes suspicions. This is a book built on manuscript evidence, not legend.

The Spy's Own Voice

Lang lets Pickle speak through his letters, and the voice is distinctive: hurried, conspiratorial, self-justifying. In a letter from Boulogne dated November 2, 1752, Pickle writes of being 'hurried, what with posting, what with Drinking, and other matters of greater weight than they dream of.' He asks for credit, promises a 'hurly Burly,' and mentions 'Highland pistoles.' The prose is breathless, full of dashes and half-revelations. Lang does not smooth these rough edges; he presents them as evidence of a man living a double life. The reader hears Pickle's anxiety—'I dare not be explicite on a certain point'—and his need for money. These letters are not polished memoirs but urgent dispatches from a man who knows he is betraying his prince.

The Elibank Plot and Its Betrayal

Chapter VIII details the Elibank plot of November 1752, a scheme to kidnap George II. Lang draws on Pickle's letters to English employers and on the Stuart Papers. The plot involved Alexander Murray, younger brother of Lord Elibank, and Young Glengarry—who, as Pickle, betrayed it. Lang notes that Charles was 'on the coast' but not in London, and that the design was abandoned 'much to his chagrin.' The chapter includes Pickle's own regret, expressed in a letter to Edgar. Lang also mentions the arrest and hanging of Archy Cameron, whose testimony to Charles's virtues and forgiveness of enemies is recorded. The section is a case study in how Lang weaves together multiple sources—state papers, private letters, published histories—to reconstruct a conspiracy that never quite happened.

Lang's Method: Manuscripts and Disclaimers

Lang is scrupulous about his sources. He thanks the Directors of the French Foreign Office Archives, Sir Arthur Halkett for a view of Balhaldie's correspondence, and Miss Macpherson of Cluny for a privately printed Memorial. He also disclaims belief in imputations against Cluny, calling them 'conjecturally hazarded by 'Newton' or Kennedy.' This is not a neutral stance: Lang defends Cluny's honor, citing his 'destitution in France' as proof. The preface reveals a historian who is also an advocate, but one who grounds his arguments in documents. He notes that 'the more important secret papers have perished in the years of turmoil and exile,' a reminder of the gaps in the record. Lang's method is to present the evidence and then offer his interpretation, always marking where inference begins.

Lang's book is best read with attention to the letters themselves, which carry the texture of eighteenth-century intrigue. The reader should note how Lang distinguishes between what the documents say and what he surmises. The Stuart Papers and Pickle's correspondence are the core; Lang's narrative is a guide through them, not a substitute. For those interested in the mechanics of betrayal, the book offers a close look at how a spy operates—through coded requests for money, feigned illnesses, and meetings at masked balls. The incognito of Prince Charles is the thread, but the fabric is the paper trail of a double agent.

Reading about Pickle’s double life, I remembered my grandfather’s quiet half-smile when he told me his own ancestor kept two ledgers, one for the crown, one for the clan. The Mayflower and Her Log; July 15, 1620-May 6, 1621 — Complete — Reading Companion gave me that same ache—how private watermarked papers hold the whole weight of a journey, each neat entry a small act of faithfulness.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Your personal reading reflection

Build a private reading journal entry for this title.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Which reading stage best describes you?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks