The New South: A Chronicle of Social and Industrial Evolution — A Closer Reading

(0 User reviews) 1802

In Category - Social History

Authors: Thompson, Holland, 1873-1940 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2004 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Southern States -- Economic conditions; Southern States -- History -- 1865-1951; Southern States -- Social conditions Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 55,805

Reading time 243 min

Text sections 9

For The New South: A Chronicle of Social and Industrial Evolution — A Closer Reading, the stored edition analysis reports 55,805 words, 4 hr 3 min estimated reading time, and 9 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 21.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Southern States -- Economic conditions,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #13107

Holland Thompson's 1919 study examines the post-Reconstruction South through its economic and social evolution, arguing that change emerged from within rather than external imposition, with detailed observations on agriculture, industry, race relations, and education.

Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg13107

Read the Text

Southerner had always been an individualist, freely exercising his right to vote independently, engaging in sharp political contests before 1861, and even during the War. The Confederate Congress wrangled impotently while Grant was thundering at the gates of Richmond. So strong was the memory of past differences, that old party designations were avoided. The political organization to which allegiance was demanded was generally called the Conservative party, and the Republican party was universally called the Radical party. The term Conservative was adopted partly as a contrast, partly because the peace party had been so called during the War, and especially because the name Democrat was obnoxious to so many old Whigs. It was not until 1906 that the term Conservative was officially dropped from the title of the dominant party in Alabama.

It is not surprising that men continued to turn for leadership to those who had led in battle and, to a less extent, to those who had taken part in the civil government of the Confederacy. But for the humiliations of Reconstruction, some of these men might have been discredited, but the bitter experiences of those years had restored them to popular favor. As the Federal soldier marched out of the public buildings everywhere, the Confederate soldier marched in. These men had led in the contest against the scalawags and the carpetbaggers and many had suffered thereby. Now they came into their own. In some States the organization of voters was almost military.

During the first years after the downfall of the Reconstruction governments the task of consolidating the white South was measurably achieved. As some one flippantly put the case, there came to be in many sections "two kinds of people--Democrats and negroes." It was the general feeling on the part of the whites that to fail to vote was shameful, to scratch a ticket was a crime, and to attempt to organize the negroes was treason to one's race. The "Confederate brigadier" sounded the rallying cry at every election, and a military record came to be almost a requisite for political preferment. Men's eyes were turned to the past, and on every stump were recounted again and again the horrors of Reconstruction and the valiant deeds of the Confederate soldiers. What a candidate had done in the past in another field seemed more important even than his actual qualifications for the office to which he aspired. A study of the _Congressional Record_ or of lists of state officers proves the truth of this statement. In 1882, fourteen of the twenty-two United States Senators from the seceding States had military records and three had been civil officers of the Confederacy. Several States had solid delegations of ex-Confederate soldiers in both houses. When one reads the proceedings of Congress, he finds the names of Vance and Ransom, Hampton and Butler, Gordon and Wheeler, Harris and Bate, Cockrell and Vest, Walthall and Colquitt, Morgan and Gibson, and dozens of other Confederate officers.

The process of unifying the white South was not universally successful, however. Here and there were Republican islands in a Democratic or Conservative sea. The largest and most important exception was the Appalachian South, divided among eight different States. It is a large region, to this day thinly populated and lacking in means of communication with the outside world. Though it has some bustling cities, thriving towns, and prosperous communities, the Appalachian South today is predominantly rural. In the 216 counties in this region or its foothills, there were in 1910 only 43 towns with more than 2500 inhabitants.

Continue Reading →

Holland Thompson opens The New South with a pointed revision of a popular phrase: the New South, he insists, is not a clean break but a 'logical development from the Old South.' The book, published in 1919 as part of the Chronicles of America series, traces how Southern society adapted after the Civil War and Reconstruction. Thompson grounds his argument in specific evidence—crop liens, mill villages, literacy statistics—rather than rhetoric. His prose is measured, often qualifying claims with phrases like 'it is to be doubted, however' or 'it must not be concluded from these figures,' signaling a writer wary of sweeping generalization.

The Argument from Continuity

Thompson’s central claim is that the South changed from within, not by outside force. He writes that the Civil War 'changed the whole organization of Southern society' but 'did not modify its essential attributes.' This distinction between structure and essence drives the book. He supports it by pointing to Reconstruction’s failure to impose 'alien institutions'—the South resisted and eventually reversed federal policies, such as black suffrage. Thompson’s language is careful: he calls Reconstruction a combination of 'high-minded altruism and a vindictive desire to humiliate,' a balanced judgment that avoids partisan heat. The chapter titles themselves trace a deliberate arc: from 'The Background' through 'The Confederate Soldier Takes Charge' to 'The Revolt of the Common Man,' suggesting a narrative of internal political realignment rather than external revolution.

The Texture of Agricultural Life

Thompson devotes a full chapter to 'The Farmer and the Land,' and his observations are concrete. He describes the crop-lien system and the sharecropping arrangement that trapped many farmers, white and black, in cycles of debt. His diction is precise: he notes that the farmer 'mortgaged his crop before it was planted' and that the lien gave the merchant control over what was grown. Thompson does not romanticize the Old South’s agriculture; instead, he points to the inefficiency of one-crop farming and the exhaustion of soil. He also records the rise of farmers’ alliances and the Populist movement, showing how economic distress translated into political action. The evidence is drawn from reports, statistics, and contemporary accounts, though Thompson rarely names specific sources in the excerpted passages.

Industrialization and Its Human Cost

The chapter on 'Industrial Development' and 'Labor Conditions' reveals Thompson’s attention to the human side of economic change. He notes the growth of cotton mills, iron furnaces, and lumber camps, but also the conditions of mill villages: long hours, child labor, and company housing. His tone is factual, not indignant. He observes that the mill operatives were often 'poor whites' from the countryside, and that the mill owners exercised paternalistic control. Thompson also remarks on the exclusion of black workers from many industrial jobs, a pattern he links to both white union policies and employer preferences. The book’s structure—placing labor conditions immediately after industrial development—underscores his interest in the social consequences of economic transformation.

Race as a System of Separate Spheres

In 'The Problem of Black and White,' Thompson catalogues the legal and customary apparatus of segregation. He lists laws forbidding intermarriage, requiring separate schools, and mandating separation on railroads and streetcars. His description is detailed: 'one end of the streetcar is often assigned to negroes and the other to whites,' with seats alternating as the car turns. He notes that 'equal accommodations' are required by law but 'violations are frequently evident.' Thompson also ventures a comparative observation, contrasting Southern white attitudes with those of Southern Europeans who 'mingled freely' with colonized peoples. He does not endorse the system; he presents it as a set of decisions made by white Southerners acting on a conviction of black inferiority. The chapter includes literacy statistics—white illiteracy at 2.2 percent, black at over 21 percent in towns—to illustrate educational disparities.

Thompson’s The New South is a work of synthesis, drawing on census data, legislative records, and contemporary reports to build its case. Readers should note that the book was written in 1919, at a moment of heightened racial tension and labor unrest, and that Thompson’s own assumptions—for instance, his reference to an 'instinctive dislike' between races—reflect the era’s discourse. The value of the book lies in its detailed, systematic account of how the South reorganized itself after war, and in the author’s effort to explain rather than merely condemn or celebrate.

There’s something tender about old books like The New South, the way they hold faith that change comes from within—slow, awkward, internal. It reminds me of other quiet afternoons spent with History of Friedrich II of Prussia — Volume 13 — Story, Setting & Ideas, where history also unfolds as private effort, not grand pronouncements. Both feel less like lessons than long, patient voices.